Labels

Monday 31 October 2016

A Filmmaker you could all learn from.


I wrote recently regarding the 56 first time British & Irish directors that I have worked with over the last eighteen years, distributing their films in the UK & Ireland. I am afraid it made for very sobering reading. 31 of these directors, now have absolutely no involvement with any aspect of film or programme making and have moved onto other unconnected careers.

However, there are some directors I worked with, who have done well and they are to be admired for carrying on with the fight to make their films. For a fight it is, unless they became one of the 3% who move on to other films with relative ease. 

One such pugilist, not in that 3% is the Irish director Maeve Murphy, who is without a doubt the hardest working auteur I have ever come across. For Maeve is a terrier who just never ever gives up.




I distributed her first film SILENT GRACE, a hard hitting drama starring Orla Brady and Connor Mullen which is based upon a true story of female IRA political prisoners in Belfast who carried out their own dirty campaign. I licensed it from the sales company Moviehouse in Cannes in 2001. It was the first film they represented worldwide and their first sale was to me.

I released it in the cinema in the UK and then on rental video and finally retail video/ DVD.




It was good enough for Maeve to make two more films BEYOND THE FIRE and TAKING STOCK. I doubt any of her films have produced her decent financial rewards, but that has not stopped her making movies. Unlike almost every other director I have worked with in the last twenty years or so she has never forgotten her first film, and more importantly she just won’t let me forget it either.




I have taken it to all UK & Irish broadcasters, several times, and sadly it was rejected. The problem is that there are just so many films made every year that UK broadcasters show but a fraction of all the films in the world.

It is said that that there are now over 7,000 feature films made every year throughout the world. (Chris Jones author of the Guerilla Filmmakers Hanbook series - thinks that figure is greater).


In the UK only around 1,000 are screened per annum in the cinema and/or on UK terrestrial and cable TV. Maybe a further 1-2,000 of these new films, at the most, wind up on Amazon and Netflix. Thus the majority are lost to UK audiences.






On four different occasions I have discussed SILENT GRACE, when at the Galway Film Fleah, with the Irish broadcaster TG4. On the last approach I was told not to submit it to them again as they were not going to take it.

Most people would have given up. Not Maeve. She has for the past two years continued to do everything she can to try to persuade, in a friendly way TG4 to reconsider and to license the film. For a while I was irritated by this, but now I look forward to her emails to them, which I am cc’d into, to see how she can remind them of the film in a new approach, carefully avoiding being repetitive.




I really do hope she gets to make a fourth film soon, and more importantly that her hard work pays off and TG4 at last license the film, for it is a good one, and one that covers a small but important part of Irish history which everyone but Maeve forgot. 

So for all you emerging filmmakers out there you need to do a "Maeve", and be a terrier who never gives up. 





Saturday 29 October 2016

For any actor having a tough time at the moment.


When we were at the Oxford Playhouse today Eileen Atkins told me that she had her first very job as an adult at this theatre at the age of 19, as an assistant stage manager (not an acting ASM,) and that she was given that offer of work by the eminent Sir Peter Hall no less. 



After her first day, she went next door to the White Rabbit pub and there was a young woman looking daggers at her. She asked who this was. Eileen was told that she was the young girl who had had Eileen's job as an ASM job before her but was sacked the week before. 

Her name she was told was Maggie Smith.



Ten weeks later Eileen was also sacked.



Therefore two of the UK's greatest female actors that have ever graced the stage, film and television, Dame Eileen Atkins and Dame Maggie Smith, were both unable to secure work as actor, having tried very hard when they started out, so they both took the only jobs that were available to them, assistant stage manager, in order to get a foot in the door of the British theatre.




AND they were both sacked because Sir Peter Hall thought them useless.

Both of them could have taken that as a sign given up there and then and got a job at John Lewis's instead. They did not. They just picked themselves up and started again. 

The most important element of getting on this industry is not so much talent but perseverance and of course luck. 


Don't let the buggers get you down!


© David Nicholas Wilkinson. 2016. All Rights Reserved. 

Thursday 27 October 2016

How many first time directors go on to make another film?


In the last 30 odd years I have released over 120 films in the cinema, on VHS/ DVD, online and to all forms of TV. 

From 1998 until the end of 2016 I only released British & Irish in Britain and Ireland. No other UK distribution company has, since Louis Le Prince made the first film in Leeds in 1888, made such a whole hearted commitment to British films, and possibly Irish films for that matter as 100% of our output has come from one or other country, and sometimes both. I did this purposely because at the time I started so few films from both countries were getting released in the cinema and would go straight to video. (This record was only broken when in 2017 I release Alex Gibney's brilliant ZERO DAYS in the cinema and DVD). This makes me an expert of sorts on British films, and possibly Irish ones too. 

56 of the films I have distributed or produced have been from first-time directors. Most of them also had first time producers, screenwriters, cast, and crew. I say when doing talks that I have helped over 1,000 first timers see their films onto British cinema screens. I have plucked this out of the air but it might even be more. On one film alone almost 60 people had not been involved in a cinema film before. 




Of those 56 new directors, these are the statistics -  

1 director has now made 5 (and a segment) films (one of those was nominated for an Oscar in 2016). 

2 directors have made 4 films each.

4 directors have made 3 films each .

2 directors have made 2 films each.

A few of those above also do TV and commercials. At least one does this to subsidise his films which he part funds himself. 

47 first time British & Irish directors that I have worked with since 1990 have not made another film for cinema release. 

9 of the 56 were women. 

(This was the case in October 2016 when this was written. It is possible that a few more filmmakers have directed another film). 




5 of those 47 have gone into television directing. One claims to have made two "films" since making that feature. They have fooled IMDb into thinking they were released in the cinema. They were not. This person obviously thinks that being seen as only a TV director is not a good thing. Odd. 

I have over the years suggested to so many of these directors that they should consider their film as a calling card to securing TV work. Of all of them, only Piotr Szkopiak and Nicholas Cohen heeded this advice. Surely it's better to director something than nothing at all? 

Piotr is at the time of writing this his second film is about to debut at the AFM, 18 years after he made his first film.  He is also very prolific director in television. I mentioned this to a filmmaker I know who has made just one film and he was so dismissive of television. He spends most of his time teaching and dreaming and its well over 10 years since that first film hit the cinema. Sadly, he has now left it too late to move into television. He made a good film but in that time so many new people have entered the industry. 

Around ten first time of these first-time directors, or so are working in corporate productions and TV commercials. It’s hard to be precise because many of those I have spoken to over the last few years are vague about what they are doing now.

Two of those first-time directors have moved into screen and theatre writing and both are doing very well, with one earning an average £100,000 + per annum over the last twelve years (very rare in my experience for writers to be this well paid). Both the films they directed lost almost their entire budget. 

Therefore 31 first time directors (over 50%) I have worked with have no connection, that I can find to date, to any part of the entertainment or filmed production industry. Some of them have totally disappeared. I owed one money to one team and it was almost two years before I found them, bruised and battered.  

Several of these were/ are even really talented and I would have thought would have had great careers before them. However, almost all of them had one thing in common; most of their films came nowhere near to recouping their budgets. One of the directors, a woman, did make a feature-length film which went into a profit, against all odds. She was offered other work but wanted a different life. 

A few of these films were made for £50,000 or less. Some had budgets of £1-2 million and one was made for $12 million. The majority were between £100-500,000. 

Only four of all of these films have, to my knowledge, made a profit. 

However, I am only the UK & Irish distributor for most of them so I am not privy to such information. Over time, and with global sales others may go into, or very near to profit. One of the profitable ventures was a film I produced and distributed and it was also a very small budget which I was able to recoup solely from the UK market. 





There are numerous reasons that many first time directors go no further in the world of cinema productions. Some just don't think the industry is for them, others want to make a living and leave film, others are still trying but are only just realizing that the hardest film to make, is so often your second film.

So very many first-timers make the same mistakes over and over again. If only they would learn from the mistakes of those who went before. 




I will highlight two films, which I will not name, both made for around the £1 million mark and both directors made almost the same mistakes. 

As they had decent budgets they could have easily avoided some of the errors.

In both cases, the directors and not the producers raised the money from private sources. 

And in both cases, the directors surrounded themselves with producers who had also not been involved in making a film before, other than student films. This turned out to be a MAJOR mistake with both films. All the producers on both films were effectively under the thumb of the directors. 

I understand why they did this because they did not want others more established to find out what they did not know. This is a mistake. I have been a professional in the industry since 1970 and whilst there is so much I do know, there is an awful lot I don't. 

There are some basic steps that can be taken to avoid falling into this trap, for a trap it is. 

The solution: 


One

They should have paid to have a well-established Executive Producer(s) work with them. Someone who has worked on successful films or been in sales & distribution. 

They should not just use them for their name, as many have done in the past. They should have made them work for their money. 

They should then have listened to their suggestions and thoughts and considered them carefully.





Two

In both cases, they made the film from very early draft screenplays. They were in such a rush to make these films that they overlooked what was wrong with each script. Maybe they did not know they were not good enough. 

Thus highlighting the need for an Executive Producer.

The best film I distribute is ADAM & PAUL.  Director Lenny Abrahamson told me that he had the screenwriter Mark O'Halloran write and write and write over and over again. I think they had 27 drafts in eighteen months. It is the most brilliant of screenplays. Every line means something. No filler. I would go as far as to say it is like Beckett, but some of the scenes I would are better than some Beckett. 

In the year that I released the film in the UK, it won the London Evening Standard award for Best Screenplay. All 683 films released that year were eligible. 

Both of the films I am highlighting films were, as one UK broadcaster who bought them as part of a larger package said, "alright" but that is all they were. As he said one was as good as a poor episode a successful episodic TV series (he named a series). 

Neither film is a bad film. I like both and there is much enjoyment to be had watching them. Each director showed great promise. 

Alright in the highly competitive world of independent film is not good enough. It is a failure. 





Three

They should have either secured or had strong interest from a UK distributor and/or an international sales agent. Then they should have taken on board suggestions and ideas they came up with.

I came onboard long after they had finished, as did the sales agents. 

We were just doing the best we could with what we were given but I am afraid it was too late then. Both films had been completed for more than a year before they came to me. In film years that is a very very long time. I doubt any distribute can make a film work after so long a gap from completion. 




Four

The two films I am referring to both have a number of very well-known actors in them, however, none of them were really up and coming which always interests buyers or established international stars. They were either once big but no more, or else only well known in the UK.

Both had budgets of around £1 million.  Had I been an executive producer I would have suggested taking maybe as much as £100,000 and used that to pay one really up and coming actor in the lead. Someone like Tom Hardy after he was in LAYER CAKE or Gemma Arterton after the Bond film. The rest of the actors I would have cast total unknowns and given them a break.

This would have ensured global sales and if they had picked a star who really took off like Hardy or Arterton and it would sell for decades to come to the likes of Netflix or Amazon, even if it was not that great a film. 




Also, had they done this, they would not have needed me or my company Guerilla Films, as the film would have been snapped up by a much bigger UK distributor and for a decent advance at that. 

None of these suggestions guarantee success but they really do lessen the chances of failure.

The directors/ producers/writers of these films were/ are talented but they blew the most wonderful opportunity, and sadly I don't think either of these teams will get a second chance.

Both films failed because each director insisted on controlling everything.

Why ?

This was either because they were supremely arrogant know it all's (having worked closely with them both on the UK distribution I doubt it) or because they were insecure they did not want the rest of the crew to find out what they did not know. Possibly they did think they were 100% right on everything. 

No one is 100% right on everything all the time. Just look at those who govern our countries for proof of that statement. 

The cast and crew of any film, want that film to be the best it can be, as it helps them move forward with their own careers. In 99 out of 100 cases they will help first-timers to make a better film. Listen to what they say. Encourage them to give an opinion. 

Never, ever, ever be afraid of asking anything.

I found myself directing, quite by accident for the first time at the age of 57. I asked some pretty dumb arsed questions to David Hughes (editor), Don McVey (DOP), Christopher Barnett (composer), Tudor Davies  (post-production sound) and the various soundmen I had on the shoot. They did not laugh when I asked. Maybe they made fun of me behind my back, but even if they did, it does not matter


With theirs’s and other people's help, I made a film that got an 89% rating on Rotten Tomatoes had over 20 really good reviews and who knows, I might actually get to make another film for the cinema?

PS.

I would love to know the figures in the USA as to how many first time directors go on to direct and fight another day. 

Anyone know?





None of the images here are from any of the films I specifically mention in this article. Five are from first-time directors. Three are not. 

© David Nicholas Wilkinson. 2016. All Rights Reserved. 
Updated. August 2017.